I need help to re-write my literature review based on the exact sources from my annotated bibliography / all sources listed in the literature review that I turned in 3 days ago were rejected as AI 100% by Turnitin, as alleged by my professor even though I organized and wrote it using research resources such a sci space and Grammarly to check spelling grammar improve to paraphrase. I also need a separate document to accompany the stand-alone lit review, a Research Proposal on my topic following the professor’s guidelines, which will, of course, incorporate a smaller section of the literature review, must follow rubrics for grading, and the example of students’ work of past literature review and research proposal. The professor provided this as a guide based on previous student work, which he said is what the expectation is to get a good grade. At this point, I not only need a good grade, but I need to make sure these papers are not flagged by Turnitin as AI-generated, or the professor will not accept them. The literature review that I turned in had only a 13% similarity turnitin, but the professor still said that it was 100% AI-generated, which is why he flagged it and rejected it for a re-do. The dilemma is I am now behind. This RP is supposed to be done in steps, and the literature review was first after I had done my annotated bibliography and now the next step was the research proposal, and now I have to redo the literature review based on these resources in the literary review draft that I turned in, which was according to my professor 100% flagged as AI wrote it which it did not though I ran it through a programming Grammarly for corrections which maybe is why it’s being flagged. The professor created the assignment to be done in steps because peer reviews are being done through Turnitin each time. When I turn in the literature review, for example, 3 students give feedback, and then we are supposed to use that to write the first draft of the research proposal, then a second draft after some feedback, and then the final draft, which is due by July 3rd . The professor’s instructions for each segment of the research proposal are attached. They are broken down by literature review draft guidelines and guidelines for the first, second, and final research proposals. At this point, I need help with the literature review re-done based on the resources approved in the literature review draft that I wrote using sci-space to research my sources. Because I used Grammarly to correct it, now it’s being flagged and rejected by Turnitin as written by AI, and the professor is asking me to redo the literature review paper and the research proposal paper separately. Applying the two focus disciplines on organizational behavior and health policy management highlights disciplines of sociology and psychology. The Literature review I turned in last week was long and can be shortened at this point, but it has to be a separate document to turn in aside from the research proposal. The research proposal should have at least 2000 words, no more than 4500 words, and cite at least eight sources for discipline for one of the disciplines, with at least 12 sources to be discussed.You do not need to include the reference list which I can add because I don’t want it to be part of the needed word count length. However, you need to use the list of resources I chose and create an annotated bibliography, which was approved by the professor to use for lit review and research proposal. This is for an interdisciplinary liberal studies writing course. I need to follow the guidelines for these two papers, and they should not be flagged as AI written FOR PLAGIARISM BY TURNITIN.
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|